
The Beauty Queen of Jerusalem Season 1 Part 2 Struggles to Find Itself
The Beauty Queen of Jerusalem Season 1 Part 2 is now available in the United States, and the show could really only improve after the horrific ending of the season’s first half.
At this point, it’s probably more accurate to say that The Beauty Queen of Jerusalem is loosely based on Sarit Yishai-Levi’s novel of the same name. This isn’t always a bad thing, but it does put the show in an…interesting narrative position.

For starters, what the show does with the character of Becky is nothing less than appalling. I don’t even want to re-hash the Season 1 Part 1 finale that was incredibly racist, but let’s just say that Becky was not the way to deal with this.
Becky is one of the novel’s most dynamic characters. It’s so sad that she’s being reduced to a plot device to further a racist storyline that’s never critically examined through a historically accurate lens.
The Beauty Queen of Jerusalem treats this character so poorly pretty much every time she’s mentioned or is on-screen. Every moment she’s a part of the story, she’s so sweet and endearing. She deserves so much better.
Hopefully, as we look toward Season 2, this character will get the chance to come into her own. The Handsome Eli Cohen story is particularly sweet and would lend itself well to a screen adaptation.

Rachel, or Rachelika, seems like she has missed at least several crucial moments in her character development. In The Beauty Queen of Jerusalem Season 1 Part 1, she goes on a deeply painful yet necessary journey as she finds her place in history.
The second half of the season short changes this character, who also has so much potential. She’s far reduced, and it’s a disservice to the character.
It is not for lack of trying on Eli Steen’s part. She does her absolute best with what she’s given. When a character is written unsatisfactorily, however, there’s only so much an actor can do.

Swell Ariel Or continues to be a standout as the show’s titular character, for all of The Beauty Queen of Jerusalem‘s flaws. The second half of Season 1 sees the character development that she deserved from the beginning.
There’s no doubt that Or is conventionally attractive. What really makes her shine, however, is her attitude. The way she portrays this character, with an indelible sense of entitlement, makes her both less likable, but so much more relatable.
What The Beauty Queen of Jerusalem does well is show Luna as a spoiled brat who really has no reason to expect anything less than the entire world after being given everything her entire life.
It’s a testament to Or’s talent that she takes a character who is so incredibly unsympathetic on paper and makes her dynamic and engaging. Even at her worst moments, it’s hard not to root for her on some level.

While it may not be historically accurate, it’s kind of fun to imagine Luna and Matilda having bat mitzvahs in early 20th Century Israel. The creative possibilities of what that would look like practically are virtually endless.
Another character whose story doesn’t quite come together is Merkada. Irit Kaplan is a phenom. Even her talent, however, isn’t quite enough to overcome the poor design this character is given.
It may sound strange, but in order for this character to work in The Beauty Queen of Jerusalem, she needs to be significantly more toxic. Leaning into the chaotic nature of this character would have served her better.
In the source material, Merkada is the worst combination of a woman firmly rooted in a previous generation and someone who steadfastly refuses to change. The second half of the season sees a very uneven character who can’t find her place.

By contrast, Michael Aloni’s Gabriel is given a redemption arc, and it…kind of works? Color me surprised since, in the source material, this is among the worst character in a cast of generally terrible people.
The Beauty Queen of Jerusalem is really making an effort to rehabilitate this character. They haven’t exactly given him an opportunity to fully process the damage his actions have caused, but he’s trying to do better.
This attempt at character redemption may only work through the sheer force of nature that is Michael Aloni. His charisma alone is able to elevate this character, and another actor may not be capable of this.
It will be curious to see how The Beauty Queen of Jerusalem handles Gabriel and Roza’s relationship repair going forward. This would be a massive deviation from the source material, about a generational cycle of unhappy marriages. It could work.

One part of the novel that frankly didn’t need to be adapted was that of the main “villain” Morduch. The source material sees this character rooted in racism, and The Beauty Queen of Jerusalem does nothing to rectify or analyze this.
It is also a bit of a cheap fake-out to have Luna’s fate hang in the balance. In the source material, this moment is a critical turning point for the character. While the series may give this moment another chance, it doesn’t work here.
The one way to redeem this fake-out is to instead explore Luna and David’s relationship in the context of the PTSD David suffers after having served in Europe during World War 2. This could absolutely work, as heartbreaking as it would be.
This may be an incredibly hot take, but there is actually a lot of potential with the introduction of Gabriel’s son with Rochel. This could be an interesting way to take the Ermoza story. Or it could be terrible, only time will tell.

Finally, the acknowledgement of how the horrors of the Holocaust were instrumental in developing the State of Israel is essential. In particular, Mr. Zach’s story is heartbreaking, but a necessary reminder of the trauma families of survivors endure.
The Beauty Queen of Jerusalem has set a course to tell its own story, far removed from the novel on which it is based. Some of this works, a lot of it does not. As Season 2 approaches, hopefully, the show can re-examine itself.
There is a lot of opportunity here. Yet the show remains so deeply frustrating in so many ways. It could be a fun and interesting period piece while offering a new perspective on Israel as a nation and a society.
Too often, The Beauty Queen of Jerusalem does not live up to everything it could be.
Stray Thoughts From the Holy Land:
- That was quite possibly the absolute wildest Havdalah that has possibly been put to screen. As serious as that moment was, I take it as a win for Jewish joy. Everything about it was perfection.
- I’m still in love with the miniatures. At this point, these set pieces are a character all on their own. They just add such depth to the scene transitions.
- These costumes are gorgeous. Seriously, props to the costume department for never missing.
- Rochel just can’t catch a break. #JusticeForRochel.
What did you think of The Beauty Queen of Jerusalem Season 1 Part 2? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
Critic Rating:
User Rating:
The Beauty Queen of Jerusalem Season 1 is now available to stream on Netflix.
Follow us on Twitter and on
Instagram!
Want more from Tell-Tale TV? Subscribe to our newsletter here!
5 comments
I loved it! As a Jew I get it and found it hilarious and tragic
Pt 2 last episode is the worst of series. So much rushed and no explanations. Need more detail on history.
I was hoping to find more comments written here. I have a hard time liking any of the characters. I’m drawn into this complex tale, but the deceit, the greed, the selfishness, the ignorance of what the Nazis are doing, make this a tale of woe. David is redeemable, but Luna is a bitch. I dislike Roza despite wanting to feel sympathetic toward her. Gabriel lives for himself, but is governed by his mother, who is also a bitch. Who do you relate to in this soap-opera???
I liked following the serie but can’t help but dislike most of the characters in it. Even though I don’t approve of Gabriels acts, constantly commiting adultry behind his wifes back, he is beyond by far the one I favour the most, but that could a factor behind that could be that
I love the actor Michael Aloni. Initially I felt sorry for Roza but started disliking her all the more. As if it was’nt already enough that she’s ugly as f…k, she’s also comes across as a pathetic looser with no selfrespect. She’s always appears as stiff and boring. I think the actor Hida Saada is as hideous in true life as she is in the serie. I had hoped later on the serie that Gabriel with divorce Roza and marry Rochel instead, but somehow arrange for Roza to manage financially.
Lunas and Mercadas characters are the ones I dislike the most. After them comes Roza. Davids actions towards Luna were absolutly horrible, but I feel sorry for him somehow since he came back from the way completly damaged. Another character I hated despite her minor roll in the serie was the bellydancer Aisha. If possible, then she’s evrn uglier then Roza and it’s a huge dissapointment that they would bring in this hideous actor to play the roll of Gabriels mistress. They’re so incompatable considering his extremly goodlooks and her crosseyed monkeyface. Rochel on the other hand is gorgeous. They could have atleast brought in an actor with good looks making it worth his visits to Lebanon to commit adultry. When it comes to Rochel, I have mixed feelings here, feeling sorry for her at the same time as I hate how she does’nt have a problem getting sexually involved with a married man, yet I still prefer her before the alpacka eyed Roza and especially that monkeyfaced whore Aisha. Ephraim, I liked him only in the beginning but was glad when this lowlife finally got killed.
Wow let’s see what you look like to call this woman hideous. Women like you are truly disgusting, I’m sure you ain’t no beauty queen. I’m a beauty consultant, people always call me me beautiful yet I manage to be humble and see the beauty in everyone else. You are truly shameful and sad, I hope you don’t have daughters.
Comments are closed.